Skip to content

G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 against Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16

G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 leads on the overall index. The price beside each button is the Amazon US reading where ScoutPrices has one; the comparison below is worked on typical prices.

Head to head

Scores

Indices out of 100 on ScoutSpecs' own scale, one per kind of work. They are not frames per second and not a measurement of any one sample.

  • Spec score

    G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18: 52

    Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16: 40

    12 ptsto the left

Price and value

Worked on typical prices, the figures the comparison is built on.

  • Value, points per $100

    G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18: 23.6

    Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16: 18.2

    30%to the left

  • Typical price

    G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18: $220

    Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16: $220

    level

From the spec sheets

  • Capacity

    G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18: 32 GB

    Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16: 16 GB

    100%to the left

  • Speed

    G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18: 3600 MT/s

    Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16: 3200 MT/s

    13%to the left

  • CAS latency

    G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18: 18

    Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16: 16

    13%to the right

The verdict

  • The G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 scores 30% higher on the ScoutSpecs index.
  • Per dollar, the G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 is the better buy: 23.6 points per $100 against 18.2.

Specifications

SpecG.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL18Kingston Fury Beast 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16
TypeDDR4DDR4
Capacity32 GB (better)16 GB
Sticks22
Speed3600 MT/s (better)3200 MT/s
CAS latencyCL18CL16 (better)
BrandG.SkillKingston
Released20162021 (better)
Typical price$220$220

The better figure of each pair is in green, with a tick.

Nearby comparisons